Language options
Table of Contents
Share
A single stack of term papers can swallow an afternoon. Multiply that by three sections and you begin to understand why teachers work about 54 hours in a typical week, barely half of which is spent in front of students, according to research by Education Week. The workload is real, and coordination often seems the hidden bottleneck. Faculty juggle office hours, committee meetings and family responsibilities.
According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, teachers worldwide spend only 43% of their work time on actual teaching, leaving ample room for grading and other related tasks. If we want more thoughtful feedback and fewer late-night marathon grading sessions, we need to schedule the grading sessions as carefully as we schedule the final exam.
I've seen teams set those sessions with a quick survey that hits all inboxes at once, then drops the most popular blocks directly into Google Calendar. The survey usually closes within hours, not days, and colleagues tell me that the time they save up front translates into a calmer, more focused grade later.
Five practical ways to tidy up grading time
1. Plan the entire semester first
Develop a master calendar that starts with the university secretary's due dates and works backward. Include assessment milestones, departmental meetings, and accreditation reviews so nothing slips through the cracks. Share the draft in your learning management system, where all faculty members can see the revisions in real time. Once everyone agrees on the skeleton, lock down dedicated grading windows without clashing with office hours or academic senate votes.
2. Compare programming tools to real numbers
The quickest way to show that a centralized polling beats an email tornado is to look at response speed and risk of overlap.
Scheduling method | Average response time | Risk of double booking |
Email chain | 3 days | High |
Shared spreadsheet | 2 days | Medium |
Centralized survey (example: Doodle) | 6 hours | Low |
Teams switching to a survey saves time because all faculty members respond on the same screen. No one is digging through threads or wondering if someone already claimed on Tuesday at two o'clock.
3. Let digital workflows do the heavy lifting
Grading is faster when scores, rubrics and comments are in the same place. Post drafts in the learning management system with the rubric attached so everyone follows the same rules. Inside Higher Ed notes that two-thirds of students already believe that teachers grade fairly; transparent workflows maintain that trust. An Edutopia analysis shows that professors who grade less frequently but with more accurate feedback improve student reviews and reduce stress. Incorporate this information into your process by sharing comment banks and color-coded checklists within the LMS.
Shared platforms only work when they incorporate the right tools. Here are the must-have features that every appraisal system should include:
Version history that tracks who has graded each submission.
In-line commenting tools that link directly to rubric rows
Automatic flagging of submissions ready for peer review.
Options for exporting final scores to the registrar's system.
4. Rotation of collaborative groups for speed and consistency
Call them grading groups, scoring circles, or simply small groups. The idea is to assign three faculty members to review the same batch, discuss questionable cases, and adjust their decisions to the rubric. The Chronicle of Higher Education researchers argue that AI assistance is most effective when humans calibrate interpretations together rather than in isolation. Start each session with a brief peer review, spot tricky patterns, and then apply consistent standards across the batch. Teachers often say they finish sooner and feel more confident with the results.
5. Close the loop with post-semester analysis
Don't limit yourself to grades. Track how many hours each group spent grading, note which rubrics elicited the most discussion, and measure the time between submission and posting of comments. When these metrics appear on a shared dashboard, faculty can adjust grading periods for the next quarter without sacrificing quality. The OECD reminds us that balance is important: too many hours spent on non-teaching tasks detracts from morale, while too few can hurt the quality of assessment. Let your data reveal where the sweet spot lies.
Coordination woven throughout the process
Faculty thrive when the learning management system enters deadlines into Google Calendar without additional clicks. A well-designed rubric clarifies expectations during summative assessment and expedites peer review. Coordination with the university registrar's office allows for synchronization of grade posting with accreditation checkpoints. Academic faculty leaders often support structured grading modules because they return time to office hours and research.
Personal reflection.
I remember how meetings once went back and forth for a week. A calm schedule allows faculty to be reflective, not frantic. What small adjustment might help your next grading cycle run more smoothly?
